Voluntary-work memo for Aalto University Student Union

I want to share this memo to everyone who considers a voluntary-work from  an organizational aspect.

Critical points that I found: 1) employees must be involved, they make a voluntary-work pleasant or terrible. An employee is the ones who shares they their work with a voluntary-worker. So an employees input, when an assignment of voluntary-work is planned, is essential. Questions like: why there should be voluntary-workers at our work group? and what an employee gets when he/she shares work and put effort to energize the voluntary worker? An employee cannot be commanded to be inspiring, a person him/herself must decide to be so. 2) Organizing is everything. An employee and a voluntary-worker must agree rights and duties at the both sides. There must be someone who is responsible for a work and it cannot be a voluntary-worker. 3) a Voluntary-workers should me involved when a voluntary-work is discussed. When voluntary-worked are left outside of decision making they are second class citizens at an organization. People are more committed to common rules and aims when they have been part of  defining those.

Language: Finnish

format: PDF

File –>

  • Share/Bookmark

Site still under construction

I realize that this never going to be “finished.” So if U looking for something please let me know.

  • Share/Bookmark

CV

Name: Lasse Granroth
Born 1983
Nationality: Finnish

Website: lassegranroth.com

Work experience

2006 – 2009 ICT person, Somatic Center Finland, part time

20032008 ICT person, Information Centre of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry in Finland (TIKE), part of a year

2001 – 2003 ICT person, Information Centre of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry in Finland (TIKE),  full time

Education

2007 – Started Master studies at Applied Art and Design program in Aalto University School Art and Design Helsinki
2007 Bachelor of Art, University of Art and Design Helsinki (UIAH), School of Design, Ceramic and Glass

Voluntary work

2010  Board Member (Development of Communication and Conseptualization) , Aalto University Student Union

Projects

2009 My Helsinki exhibition in Washington DC, concept design and organizing, University of Art and Design Helsinki,
2009 River City Guandu, consept design of a new community to Taipei, Taiwan, Sustainable Global Studio, Helsinki University of Technology,
2009 Craft Button, business plan for global craft market place, Helsinki School of Economics

Exhibitions

2008 Lights in a Greenhouse, Järvenpää

Group exhibitions

2008 Disco, Gallery Norsu, Helsinki
2007 Cover, Gallery Norsu, Helsinki
2007 Cover, Talents exhibition, Ambiente Fair, Frankfurt, Germany
2006 Joutsenen Jäljillä II. Mediacenter LUME, Helsinki
2006 Tyhjä kulho. Empty bowl-event. Cathedral crypt, Helsinki
2006 Tyhjä kulho – Empty bowl, Gallery Norsu, Helsinki
2006 Joutsenen Jäljillä I. Lasipalatsi, Helsinki
2006 9–Processing Art. Gallery Atski, UIAH
2006 Breakfast for Two. School of Design, Ceramics and Glass, UIAH
2006 Club ambulant Helsinki. Mediacenter LUME, UIAH

Excursions

2006 20 +1 Tonzan Kilns, international wood firing conference, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, USA
2005 Joutsenen Jäjillä, community art from the sea, from Portugal to Venezuela

  • Share/Bookmark

Change by design, Brown (2009)

Brown writes about design thinking and almost promises that it could change the world.

So what is design thinking? Design thinking is a participatory design method where not only designer, but also everyone else, from company’s layer to probable heavy user, can join the design process. So tha design thinking is very much human oriented. When everyone, from any field of profession they may be,  who have information about topic, can participate a knowledge pool is enormous. That is one of the strengths of the method. When future users can make a difference during the process, that means also motivation for whole team. Lets not be naive. Lot of people specially from many fields means lot of communication problems that means more time, and more money. Many issues are so complicated that professionals from one field are not enough.

Of course we need to have holistic view to an issue. Better not just improve old thing, but rethink level up topic. When process starts it means lot of uncertainty among design team. There is no direction when possibilities are harvested. When right design question has found still there is no clear picture of future to reach, more uncertainty. Iteration process might seem to be endless, but when idea turn to working proto team is on winner side.

So third element of the method is prototyping. This means make it concrete some how. It might be on paper, it might be made of cardboard it does not matter, but idea must be made concrete before it can be valued. Prototyping is a method of learning. It might seem to wast of time beginning of a design process, but author writes that it is most important method to understand an issue. Again it is also way to create motivation and inspiration among a group. It highly recommended, when team is losing its motivation, to see what it has done, that project is moving, even it does not feel like it.

From my point of view, what is role of a designer? Brown writes that designer is a mentor in a team. I have wrote before that designers are tolerating more uncertainty than people from many other fields and their presence at a design team raise teams whole tolerance of uncertainty. After working at multidisciplinary teams I have noticed that motivation problem is big, specially if communication is not working. Old manners are hard to break and taking the longer road to see whole picture many times is hard to understand. “Why do we do these things, why not the solve this problem same way it has done, it works?!” This is question I have heard many times. And as many times have have explained it. I have noticed that message is not passing through. So again there is member of my team is dealing with uncertainty what to do.

  • Share/Bookmark

Pää Pyörällä, Isokorpi (2008)

Sorry that I have been lazy last few months. I read this one weeks ago, but finally I have time to make notes.

And another sorry that I didn’t find a  translation, so maybe there isn’t one yet.   Bug the publisher to do something about it, because this one is VERY good one.

Isokorpi has wrote that the book is about relaxing and living at a moment. To me it is also about emotion transfer between people and how much it to our well-being. Work coaching is Isokorpis profession so thats her angle to the topic. and I got an idea that she know what is she is writing about.

Have U thought that when U tell a story to some one U live it at the same time? So listener listen the story, but also read Ur way to tell it and Ur emotions. And all that affect his/hers thoughts about the story. Some subconscious level we transfer emotions from and to each other. And U cannot stop it totally. Every one has been situation where person notice someone is angry even he/she  has not done or said anything. Isokorpi says that people around are affected by others emotions. Someone around that person may come angry also, making up their own explanation for their anger. (Why he/she does not say anything then she/he is so obviously angry!) Another way to react is to repeat persons habit to react to other persons anger from his/her past. That is something that we do all the time. React same way that we have done before even, situation is not the same.  Our emotional, physical reactions are mainly based our earlier experiences. And of course anger is rarely experienced with joy. So basic rule is that a person draws others towards same kind emotion that he/she has at the moment. Power of persons influence is depending on people sensitivity and reactions. It works on both ways. People in a good mood affects other so feeling better. I think this is basic idea why nowadays people are not seen anymore as machines at he work. We are allowed to feed and show our emotions. Our emotions are vital energize to our (working)communities.

One change Isokorpi has seen in workplaces is that employees are not against superior but more against fellow colleague. There might be many reasons, one is that hierarchy has flatten,  another is that we are more self centered and employees just visiting at a job for few years before moving to next one. Situation have set colleague to be rivals. Many times it is leading to envy and working community without trust.

Author underlines a meaning of trust in a community. Without trust there is no openness so knowledge is hidden. Without trust there is no creativity when person is afraid of consequences of their risk taking actions. Isokorpi writes that community of trust cannot be build on communication technology but real life meetings. Be in a same place at the same time and really be there, also with his/hers thoughts.

To achieve trust we should more work together. Author claims that person does not love another person, but actions done with him/her. a Person loves an actions that makes him/her happy, actions that includes possibility to learn more, get feedback and be better on it.  Happiness at a workplace can be based on team working with highly developed work coaching.

Book is built a simple way, but content needs lot of time to  digest and some of my friend say that it opens differently every time U read it. That is probably true. I have to admit that my background knowledge of this subject was not enough to understand it all. So next year this book is back at my hands.

Thanks to Margit Sjöroos for recommending this book to me.

  • Share/Bookmark

Intelligent Self Leadership, Sydänmaalakka (2006)

Sydänmaalakka is talking about self leadership, what does it means? A Person should have a total control his or herself, true?

Maybe, but when he is talking about controlling your feelings and values, it is gets much harder to understand what does it means in everyday life. How do I change the way I feel? Sydänmaalakka tries to answer to these questions. And at least in level of ideas he succeed.

World around is complex and impossible to control, but feeling of control is one of the keys to felicity. It means controlling yourself, not the world. And how man can control feelings? Sydänmaalakka separates two steps of feeling, first emotion and then feeling. Emotion is a basic reaction to situation. For example seeing dangerous animal man is afraid and flees. But after that man have a possibility to feel excitement, fear or joy.  Sydänmaalakkas idea is that man should give a moment of thinking to analyze what really happened, analyze why do man feel the way man feels.There is a possibility to see situation from positive or negative side. Man should observe and influence to his/hers everyday processes to see positive side of situations.

To myself interesting question is, how man should motivate, inspire, keep up good mood. I have been rethinking ideas of Himanen and many other authors who have wrote that human groups prosper because people motive each other. If man motive him/herself man needs others only to give a new perspective and information. Of Course vision is not black or white. Should person set at first priority keep up a good mood and motivate others or support them to grow to be experts of self leadership? No answer yet.

  • Share/Bookmark

Finding Flow, Csikszentmihalyi (1997)

Are U happy, pleased, full of joy? Csikszentmihalyi has studied happiness and his conclusion is that our time is lack of meaning. In western societies most of us don’t need to struggle to survive, surviving itself does not bring any gladness. So our time is boring. What to do with all this time we have? There are so many options and so few rules to help to pick right one.

Flow is a experience of a challenge, feedback, learning and joy. Person must put energy to face a challenge bit too hard to persons skills and beat it. That is a way to flow, feeling of success. (a true feeling of joy)

So pick a goal that is challenging enough and do everything to achieve it! Simple, now we just need a webservice that generates goals that challenge us.

When I think a community, only good one is the one that actively challenges you, gives a feedback, celebrates victories big and small. It means motivations. Actually it is quit same what Pekka Himanen has wrote about enriching communities.

  • Share/Bookmark

Dialogue and the art of thinking together by Williams Isaacs (1999)

Williams writes that dialogue is tool to creative thinking. He defines that not any conversation serve that purpose. His dialogue means four steps: politeness, argue, soul-searching and finally understanding the entirety. and most of the groups won’t ever reach to third step.

So we should argue more to vital our dialogue with emotional energy so strong argument rises.

and I agree the theory, (at least I’m willing to test the idea.)

There are some other ideas I want to share here.  How human behavior is mainly memory reflection based. Meaning that most of the things we do, we do in same way that we have done before or someone that taught to us to do. not really thinking. Thinking is not efficient, it takes time.

Here is a diagram that I want to share with you. It is same than in a book. I just added translation based on diagram, but also a text, so it would be easier to understand. I also added result column to make a difference of creative dialogue and conversation.  


  • Share/Bookmark

Elämä taideteoksena essay about creative groups

Pekka Himanens lecture series Elämä Taideteoksena inspired me to write an essay about my view to creative groups. I have been turned over why  a multidisciplinary interaction is so important (think about new Aalto university). How group with people from different fields work together, does it effect to result of a group project, does it effect to an individual in a group? My conclusion is that a multidisciplinary group is a source of new ideas, but a trust needed to find a creative flow needs a lot of emotional support from the group.

Language: Finnish

format: PDF

File –>

  • Share/Bookmark

Master theses plan v.085

My master theses is about research of influence of a designer in a community. The Study focuses to soft values: welfare, creativity and attitude against change. I will observe and analyze the influence at Finnish business cases, small organizations where designer have joined recently (couple years ago max).

Now I’m looking those organizations! If you know one please contact.

There are challenge to achieve a credibility. I do not have resources (time) to study many organizations as I would like to. Other major question is about the influence of a designer, can a properties of a community to be linked to a designer. Is there a pattern to be found.

Language: Finnish

Link to file -> (PDF)

  • Share/Bookmark